Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 10 (Trustworthy Vote) Date: 12/08/2005 11:16:44 pm PST By: steamer Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=476618
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Value:10 Weight: 5 (Veritable Vote) Date: 11/22/2002 07:12:09 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.247.121) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=154770
how would the 10mm WA compare to ........ 9mm nagler 9.7mm meade 4000 super plossl tmb 10mm super mono tv 10mm radian thanks john i am using a meade sct 10" f/10 >I've owned or tried every Speers-Waler except the 5-8 zoom, which has plenty of reviews elsewhere... >The 7mm has the flattest field and the best edge performance of the line. The 12mm was a close second, but showed very slight field curvature at the extreme edge. > >The 7mm is my favorite for viewing small planetary nebula at medium-high magnifications. The eyepiece has excellent contrast and brightness for such a huge stack of glass. > >Star images are very tight, and lateral color is almost non-existant. (better than the 10mm SW, which does show a tiny bit of lateral color) > >Build quality is very good, but not on par with Televue, Pentax, etc. Watch out for dust on the field lens... > >NOTE: These comments are based upon my tests in a 12.5" F5.5 dob/newt. Different scopes and different focal ratios will likely yield different results. > >Greg Granville >greg@cpoclub.org
Overall Rating: 9 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/01/2001 08:23:47 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.92.43) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=43864
©2023 by Excelsis Consulting. All Rights Reserved. E-mail webmaster to report abuse, problems, or comments.