Lumicon O-III


 Info  Votes  Messages  More Stats  Up One Level
Switch to Subject View
Post Message



Page 1 of 1


Subject: Is 5" too small??
By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.178.2)
Date: 11/10/2002 06:38:42 am PST
Is 5" a too small aperture for a O-III filter?


Reply
Post Un-related Message


Subject: Re: Is 5" too small??
By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.175.63)
In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.178.2) (Original Message)
Date: 02/05/2003 07:57:06 am PST
>Is 5" a too small aperture for a O-III filter?
The answer depends on the telescope type and F ratio. I have
tried using an O-III filter on a 5 inch catadioptric, and I can say that because of the high F-ratio, it makes the objects I have observed too dark. With a lower F-ratio refractor or reflector, under low magnitification this type of extremely narrow filter may provide noticeable benefit for the intended class of nebula, but I would recommend using a less selective narrowband filter such as the Lumicon UHC or Orion Ultrablock. The O-III filter makes sense when starting out with a large amount of light collection, say a 10 inch aperture, and the target is one known to emit strongly at the narrow spectral range passed by the most selective filter type.


Reply
Post Un-related Message


Subject: Re: Is 5" too small??
By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.23.10)
In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.175.63) (Original Message)
Date: 06/26/2003 02:34:18 pm PST
>>Is 5" a too small aperture for a O-III filter?
>

I use a 2" OIII on my TMB-105/650 with wonderful results. I have picked up the Veil easily from the suburbs on a 1/4 moon night.. and that's only a 4" scope!

Now... by "easily" I mean I can see it... it's clearly there. It's not like the same image with detail and convolutions and folding, as seen through a 12.5" Portaball or (the Orion Neb through a ) 25" Zeiss SCT!

Be aware that every Lumicon filter has different transmission numbers.. mine are in the mid-90's. You may have different results if the filter has rates in the 80's.


Reply
Post Un-related Message


Subject: o-III filters
By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.44.119)
Date: 08/19/2005 02:45:09 pm PST
I agree that an O-III filter is a MUST for almost all planetary nebulae. Some require a UHC filter.
Without the O-III, the Dumbell nebula looks like a hazy, fuzzy patch of light. With the O-III filter , you can even see the outer extentions in this nebula
The O-III is a highly recommended filter for ANY deep sky obsever.


Reply
Post Un-related Message


Page 1 of 1

[Click Here to Login]
Don't have a login? Register!