| Info | Votes | Messages | More Stats |
 Up One Level
|
 | ||||
Subject: Re: vote by xxx.xxx.204.26 By: voyager In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.204.26) (Original Vote) Date: 12/15/2004 11:04:12 pm PST >This eyepiece is simply a "gem"! Sharp to the very edge, great eye relief, no kidney bean, light weight, hand crafted....this is my workhorse eyepiece for my custom made 12.5" f4.8 Dob. This ocular along with all of Harry's Observatory Class line are a great match for faster scopes. > >Also, the price ($199) cannot be beat for an ocular that matches the Panoptics in performance (in my humble opinion)....Thanks a bunch Harry and Kathy! > >Steady Skies! Christian here again - sorry, I'm posting a response to make this vote "reliable", as I did not log in. Subject: Re: vote by xxx.xxx.204.26 By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.19.152) In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.204.26) (Original Vote) Date: 02/13/2006 08:47:39 pm PST I received one of these a week ago for use with my 12 f/5 Dob. The eyepiece I received is good, but not great in my book. Mine displays internal reflection on bright objects like Sirius, requires a focuser extension tube to reach focus and a hint of astigmatism even on axis. On the plus side, the field is very flat to the edge, eye relief is ample and overall it's a very comfortable eyepiece to use. I haven't yet done a head to head with premium eyepieces (like the 27mm Panoptic, 14mm Meade UWA, 17mm Vixen Lanthanum Superwide, 21mm Pentax XL, etc.), but have concerns about transmission given the internal reflection in mine. Of course, as you say, these are handmade, so maybe you got a good one and I got a less good one. Page 1 of 1 | ||||||||
