| Info | Votes | Messages | More Stats |
 Up One Level
|
 | ||||
Subject: Re: vote by xxx.xxx.134.49 By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.202.206) In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.134.49) (Original Vote) Date: 02/24/2006 11:26:34 pm PST >No ED-doublet should ever be called "apochromatic"!!! Everyone bashes Meade for this practice. Remember that they're not the only ones calling doublets APOs. The label is well-deserved. Of course, if the optics aren't aligned, there will be a lot of color. The same can be said for Al's best doublets. I've seen it. Subject: Re: vote by xxx.xxx.68.18 By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.202.206) In Reply to: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.68.18) (Original Vote) Date: 02/24/2006 11:27:17 pm PST >I had the chance to use on of these at the local community college. There was COLOR in the field when looking at saturn and jupiter. Tho the two planets did show good detail, like refractor should. > >I only give this a 5 b/c of the advertising meade uses. If they would say near apo or achro I wouold give the scope optics a ten. > >I haven't used the GOTO tho Collimate the optics and the color will go away. Page 1 of 1 | ||||||||
