Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 09/20/1999 08:35:47 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.126.16) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39274
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/05/1999 09:23:16 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.190.95) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39275
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/20/1999 01:39:14 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.27.117) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39276
This is a comment only. The post about the 22mm Nagler yielding a 4 degree true field is incorrect for the f/7 model. It's close for the old f/5 version, but not the new version. The True Field in the f/7 92mm Stowaway with a 22mm Nagler T4 is NOT 4 degrees. The field stop of the 22mm Nagler is 31.1mm. The focal length of the f/7 Stowaway is actually 604mm (f/6.6) per the AP website. So using the field stop calculation of (31.1/604)*57.3 gives you a TFOV of only 2.95 degrees. The 31mm Nagler yields a true field of 3.98 degrees
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 04/30/2000 06:39:43 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.105.74) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39277
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 06/04/2000 12:56:56 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.105.94) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39279
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 06/08/2000 02:53:25 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.53.3) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39280
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 07/10/2000 10:53:57 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.126.28) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39281
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 08/21/2000 01:51:24 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.137.179) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39282
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/03/2000 07:24:19 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.213.14) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39284
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/08/2001 10:00:09 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.70.111) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=39287
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 01/04/2003 06:48:49 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.195.66) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=174739
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 01/12/2003 02:36:27 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.208.42) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=177778
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:8 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/08/2004 09:23:21 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.60.147) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=339365
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:10 Ease of Use:9 Value:9 Weight: 10 (Trustworthy Vote) Date: 06/08/2004 02:51:41 pm PST By: ckw1astro Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=354965
Page 1 of 1
©2023 by Excelsis Consulting. All Rights Reserved. E-mail webmaster to report abuse, problems, or comments.