Overall Rating: 10 Optics:9 Value:10 Weight: 7 (Veritable Vote) Date: 08/30/2003 08:11:50 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.91.215) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=293029
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:9 Value:10 Weight: 3 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/01/2003 11:58:49 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.3.66) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=315727
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Mount:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 3 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/10/2003 05:57:57 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.104.153) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=317972
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 5 (Veritable Vote) Date: 01/01/2004 03:33:13 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.18.49) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=330404
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 03/07/2004 02:24:47 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.10.63) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=345546
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 5 (Veritable Vote) Date: 05/24/2004 01:25:02 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.164.121) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=361340
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Value:9 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 08/04/2004 07:42:12 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.26.54) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=372038
Overall Rating: 1 Optics:1 Mount:1 Ease of Use:1 Value:1 Weight: 5 (Veritable Vote) Date: 08/31/2004 10:46:03 am PST By: Shadow Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=378857
>This "1" is for the average. >Where a Takahashi is voted as a 4 by an idiot and as a 1 by a >psycho this chinese ED is a 1.5. >I looked thru one and see lots of colour and the fokuser is a joke. I also see (little) colour with my FS-60C but more in the >chinese. >Not recommended (only for beginners, who upgrade from a 80mm f/4 ahro) > >Lamont Are you sure your talking about the same telescope??? Have you read the reviews on the Magazines (Sky and Telescope) for ex.?? All of them rated this scope as very good...stange...maybe they all have some kind of problem with their eyes.
>This "1" is for the average. >Where a Takahashi is voted as a 4 by an idiot and as a 1 by a >psycho this chinese ED is a 1.5. >I looked thru one and see lots of colour and the fokuser is a joke. I also see (little) colour with my FS-60C but more in the >chinese. >Not recommended (only for beginners, who upgrade from a 80mm f/4 ahro) > >Lamont Lamont You are in a minority of one
Lamont , just because someone trashes a tak whats that got to do with this. tak. makes great scopes. This little orion scope is the best apo/money wise i have ever seen . dont drive angry!
Lamont, You are a total dumbass and a complete idiot!!! This scope has great optics and is an incredible value. Every experienced astronomer that has looked through mine has been amazed and had nothing but wonderful things to say about it. Actually almost everyone that has looked through my ED80 wants to go out and buy one! Oh and by the way... Learn how to spell you dummy! Duh! Anthony >This "1" is for the average. >Where a Takahashi is voted as a 4 by an idiot and as a 1 by a >psycho this chinese ED is a 1.5. >I looked thru one and see lots of colour and the fokuser is a joke. I also see (little) colour with my FS-60C but more in the >chinese. >Not recommended (only for beginners, who upgrade from a 80mm f/4 ahro) > >Lamont
It takes an idiot and a psycho to recognize one. >This "1" is for the average. >Where a Takahashi is voted as a 4 by an idiot and as a 1 by a >psycho this chinese ED is a 1.5. >I looked thru one and see lots of colour and the fokuser is a joke. I also see (little) colour with my FS-60C but more in the >chinese. >Not recommended (only for beginners, who upgrade from a 80mm f/4 ahro) > >Lamont
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 09/19/2004 03:19:51 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.116.202) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=388092
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 09/20/2004 09:40:03 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.116.202) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=388317
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:10 Ease of Use:9 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 09/20/2004 09:57:48 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.116.202) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=388502
Yes, there are some moderators, but the philosophy of this site is to have everyone express their views, good or bad. The criteria for vote removal is usually that the vote is 1) completely unuseful (very short comments) and 2) the vote is anonymous. Otherwise, we also rely on users to self-moderate by rating votes. >just a side note: i hope this site has a moderator i dont >understand some of these people giving this scope a low >rating just because they are angry about something. >Takahashi and astrophysics are beautifull scopes >but that has nothing to do with reviewing another manufacturers product. it hurts the integrity of this site >for people who really want to learn about products. >These kind of angry low ratings should be deleted >everywhere for any product on this site. i was really >surprised to see this kind of criminal activity.
Overall Rating: No Vote Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/05/2004 07:53:08 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.86.107) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=392718
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/11/2004 05:05:24 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.144.120) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=394121
Overall Rating: 8 Optics:8 Ease of Use:9 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/15/2004 05:59:06 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.78.2) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=402047
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:8 Mount:0 Ease of Use:0 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 12/20/2004 08:39:51 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.220.109) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=409230
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Mount:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 12/31/2004 08:20:24 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.164.99) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=411040
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/22/2005 03:44:13 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.81.21) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=421254
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 04/11/2005 09:59:28 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.164.121) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=431592
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:9 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 11/14/2005 04:30:54 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.251.148) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=472790
Overall Rating: 10 Optics:10 Ease of Use:10 Value:10 Weight: 5 (Veritable Vote) Date: 02/16/2007 03:57:09 am PST By: Rustiebin Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=546990
Page 1 of 1
©2023 by Excelsis Consulting. All Rights Reserved. E-mail webmaster to report abuse, problems, or comments.