Overall Rating: 8 Optics:7 Value:9 Weight: 3 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 06/28/2002 12:30:15 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.228.0) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=108203
Overall Rating: 4 Optics:6 Value:9 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/30/2004 01:44:02 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.217.37) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=398578
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:8 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 07/26/2004 07:40:39 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.174.54) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=369684
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:7 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 12/16/2002 12:47:44 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.136.2) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=167001
Overall Rating: 2 Optics:2 Value:2 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 01/20/2002 07:18:01 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.161.1) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=58838
>Complete and utter nonsense and rubbish from reviews that I have read. This bino uses BAK 7 glass which is so inferior for astronomy that even coke bottles would be superior. Someone obviously is trying to hype an inferior product here. Probably the manufacturer of this crap! >For anyone to claim to be able to see 4 to 6 bands on Jupiter's surface using 15 power and BAK 7 glass, or see Saturn's rings and 2 moons, you must have a field of bovine manure that you shovel daily. Then why pay 700 bucks for a pair of Fujinons, 500 for Adlerblicks, or Orion BAK 4 glass if these 80 buck binos smoke with BAK 7 glass? They don't make them with BAK7, they use BAK4. I have seen good reviews of this bino at non-commercial sites (cloudy nights) by people who have no vested interest in the product. I believe these are also the same as the Oberwerks 15x70 which Todd Gross gave a good review. If you are going to post an opinion, it would help if you actually used these binos, which clearly you have not.
>Complete and utter nonsense and rubbish from reviews that I have read. This bino uses BAK 7 glass which is so inferior for astronomy that even coke bottles would be superior. Someone obviously is trying to hype an inferior product here. Probably the manufacturer of this crap! >For anyone to claim to be able to see 4 to 6 bands on Jupiter's surface using 15 power and BAK 7 glass, or see Saturn's rings and 2 moons, you must have a field of bovine manure that you shovel daily. Then why pay 700 bucks for a pair of Fujinons, 500 for Adlerblicks, or Orion BAK 4 glass if these 80 buck binos smoke with BAK 7 glass? My only comment would be this....have you even used these? Your review ( if you want to call it that ) sounds like someone trying to justify having spent a lot more money for perhaps not an appreciable improvement in performance.
Overall Rating: No Vote Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 12/20/2001 07:37:01 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.220.8) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=167180
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/03/2001 11:26:05 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.102.20) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=41915
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 08/05/2001 01:05:29 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.105.181) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=41914
Overall Rating: 8 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 04/12/2001 06:05:04 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.59.85) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=41913
Overall Rating: 10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 01/20/2001 09:19:39 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.210.61) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=41911
©2023 by Excelsis Consulting. All Rights Reserved. E-mail webmaster to report abuse, problems, or comments.