Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/10/2004 01:40:08 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.42.10) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=339755
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:9 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 02/07/2003 05:27:53 pm PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.204.47) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=190036
Overall Rating: 9 Optics:10 Value:10 Weight: 1 (Unreliable Vote) Date: 10/22/2002 05:57:22 am PST By: Anonymous (xxx.xxx.195.44) Link to this vote: http://www.excelsis.com/1.0/displayvote.php?voteid=141790
just received a 32mm antares plossl .looks good but not tested however clearly marked "made in china" not japan as most folk here seem to say. what's that about then? regards davethekelley@yahoo.co.uk >I purchased this eyepiece from Sky Instruments in Canada at a very reasonable price ( less than the US dealers selling them) and have been most satisfied! This eyepiece is the same unit Celestron sells as their Ultima plossl. It compares very favorably with my Pentax 14mm wide angle in both sharpness and contrast in fact it probably beats the pentax ( although the field is smaller and much less eye relief). On the moon and planets it is excellent.Workmanship (japanese made) is equally fine and does'nt dissapoint. All things considered I don't think you can go wrong with this one.
©2023 by Excelsis Consulting. All Rights Reserved. E-mail webmaster to report abuse, problems, or comments.